Cosmos

Philosophy

Exploration needs breadth and progress toward a testable question. Promotion should depend on supplied core fields, and a repaired idea should not inherit its predecessor’s ledger unchecked.

Architecture & control flow

1. 01

   Prioritize later-stage nodes, then rank within a stage by unfinished actions, coverage bonuses and exploration terms.

2. 02

   Track provenance coverage across five core candidate fields to limit seed-filled content being labeled model-generated.

3. 03

   Reject foreign or stale UUID ledger bindings and route repaired candidates through renewed refutation and review.

4. 04

   Preserve low-confidence mathematics–physics mappings rather than assigning internal confirmed_novel without sufficient criticism and responses.

Architecture outline derived from this version’s control flow.

What this version changes

Compared with Galaxy, adds stage scheduling, core-field provenance audits, strict UUID binding and a ledger lifecycle for repairs.

Implementation & evidence scope

The candidate path is primarily tested with simulated calls, and later documentation identifies remaining scheduling randomness. The mathematics–physics bridge lacks complete live literature retrieval; internal confirmed_novel is not independent proof of scientific novelty.

Code & bundled material

The introduction draws on bundled notes, changelogs and central code. Software tests, synthetic diagnostics and scientific effectiveness use different evidence standards.